While reading about comics online, I came across a discussion in which the general concensus was that negative criticism and unfavorable reviews were in various ways wrong and a detriment to the cultural dialogue of the comics world. You can read the original discussion here: http://www.thewebcomiclist.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7016
I strongly disagree with the notion that bad reviews are “bad.”
As a former art school student, I believe in the value of a sound thrashing. And I don’t mean “constructive criticism” either. I also come from the old school Comics Journal school which supposes that there is something for the reader to gain from ANY in-depth analysis of a work.
Reviews and critiques are not for the creator’s benefit, but for the benefit of the reading public. That’s why many of the better critics are non-practicioners; those who have little or nothing to lose or gain by praising or condemning a work.
Sometimes there’s more good to be said for the artform in making an example out of its lesser practicioners. As played out as Rob Liefeld-bashing is, for example, many of us, both readers and creators have gained a good deal from the extensive analysis (or rather, condemnation) of his work. As an example.
Personally, I feel that most of the branches of comics–webcomics, minicomics, literary graphic novels, etc–have become far too comfortable and complacent throughout the years and much of this is due to the fact that the writers of criticism are too close to their subjects to offer anything but acceptance and support. Not that I have a problem with that per se. My problem is that there’s not much counter balance. Most critical voices in comics are good friends with the subjects that they cover and most are peers as well. Most critical voices in comics are good friends with the subjects that they cover and most are peers as well. I’ve heard people say in conversation things that you would never read on the internet or in a magazine because people just can’t express their feelings. There’s trends, styles and genres that probably would NOT exist if the people who disliked them all stood up and voiced their opinions on the subjects. But nobody wants to be the bad guy. Nobody wants to be the person who offended Person C because C is friends with B.
During the waning days of The Comics Journal’s “mean” criticism, I managed to learn a great deal and found my world enriched by the hard standards established by the “bad guys” who dared to say “you know–this comic is just NO GOOD!”
I’m just saying.
THE PURPLE
